SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (5586)6/4/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Jeffrey D  Read Replies (1) of 15132
 
Wally, thanks for the information. Analysts expected 232,000 new jobs and there were only 11,000. One can only hope stock analysts are more accurate!<gg>
You know, you just can't win with Bloomberg. Before announcement they run a story that with 232,000 new jobs expected this will pressure the Fed. to raise rates.

quote.bloomberg.com

Then, after the announcement of only 11,000 jobs created they run a story that this small increase shows small job market and this will then pressure employers to raise salaries to get new employees and to keep the ones they have. Well, gee, maybe the economy is slowing down and that is why employers didn't hire as many as the "experts" anticipated.

quote.bloomberg.com

Geez, Bloomberg is on a rate hike mindset regardless of the outcome.

Wally, a question. Hourly rate goes up .05. What creates more potential for inflation? That increase or if the "experts" had been right and 232,000 new jobs created due to an expanding economy? Just asking. Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext