joan,
Well I see you're still quite adept at defending the indefensible.
What you said about Schuh was:
>>Dan
Schuh, after having been stung repeatedly by a million wasps, finally
went bonkers,<<
to which Bill Vaughn accurately pointed out that you were assigning him "victim" status. Speaking strictly from my own personal experience with the inimitable Mr. Schuh. A much more apt description would be he was much more like the annoying insect that keeps coming back to bite and sting, no matter how many times you wave it away, finally you get fed up and take out the fly swatter and eliminate the irritant. Basically I considered his doltish behaviour insufferable and rather than "swat" at him, I chose to ignore his posts, but even with that, whenever I would make an appearance, I would usually receive an unsolicited, insulting comment from him. Eventually I went into mostly lurk mode to avoid him and once I saw that SI recognized his blatant violation of the terms of use and removed him, I decided that the thread was "safe" for normal discourse.
BTW, I notice that your original appearance here was due to an errant post of Neocon's, so your opinion is duly noted...... feel free to retire to your Grammar thread where your type of "correction" seems to be appreciated.
bp |
