SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (463)	6/4/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: Iditarod	Read Replies (1) of 1239

I agree with your comments re: grades. That's what makes plays like Ferguson Lake so exciting, and what we are all waiting for right now! The tonnages certainly appear to be there. Now its just a matter of seeing how rich the cores are. I think there's a lot of us who are particularly interested in seeing how much platinum and palladium there is in the initial holes. Some rich Ni + Cu + Co grades over good widths would be real nice to see - even better if there are some zones of strong Pt + Pd values. I think we might see the SRU / Ferguson Lake story play out like IMZ's Bajo de la Alumbrera (Argentina) deposit did a few years back. Everyone recognized at the outset that the ore tonnages were world-class, and it became a matter of drilling off the deposit and outlining enough by-product (co-product?) gold to make Alumbrera a mine. It's early in the game. I'll be looking forward to more news from SRU over the next few weeks! Regards, Iditarod

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next