Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 272.16

+0.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J R KARY who wrote (25045)	6/4/1999 12:35:00 PM
From: Richard Habib	Read Replies (3) of 213176

Jim, I suppose the concern is that Apple has based its updated chipset on the G4 processor. It appears to me that using IBM chips will mean no real progress on the motherboard. The PC world on the other hand will have a 133 Mhz front side bus, rambus 800 Mhz memory, 4X AGP available to it in Sep. That's why I indicated that the Mhz vs performance gap will begin to close in that timeframe. It's conceivable that the PPC will no longer have nearly as much advantage. Graphics may especially be impacted. Apple will need to rapidly ramp Mhz to keep parity. This may be why we are now hearing about a 600 Mhz PPC to be available this fall. That schedule is quite accelerated from what we've seen recently on the Mhz front. Even so, Apple/IBM will need to really push as the likely intro of Intel's Coppermine in Sep will be at 733 on the desktop while Geyersville for portables will intro at 600 (On AC power). By the way I agree IBM does know its business. Probably too late to backtrack on Altivec but I am very leery of MOTs ability to execute. Rich

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next