SI Grammar and Spelling Lab Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Edwarda who wrote (2780)	6/6/1999 4:12:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (2) of 4711

True, the spellchecker IS inconsistent. It let "hebce" through, for example. (No, Christopher, I did not uncheck anything.) I will now try an experiment. I will send through a passel of deliberately misspelled and/or invented words, to see whether they all get highlighted: holp hulp heep horck hooble honck hebce henbit horbit hunck hoople hurble hordle honger hoopler humber howny hoodwonk woodoo Heck, they ALL got zapped. Let's try again: damm nutz fouey ratzz cow patooty dawgawn schlits honkahonka Well, look at that: it let "damm" (double-m damn) pass (along with "cow", of course)! Joan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next