SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Fowler who wrote (61007)6/7/1999 2:26:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Mark, I think i'll BTC first thing in the morning. Not so much because of Bezo's 10mil customer, but because in the next few weeks Bezos might announce a billion customers have ordered thru him, Hannibal #2.
Mark, please also think about this. Tomorrow if I get out, say @ 110, that will bring me a $70k profit. That's more than Bezo made, in Amzn's much publicized short history!! Don't you think??
Ps
Then I can short it , when the pig gets over-fed again, and the street once again begins to worry about Bezos's $losses. The only $money I might leave on the table is, if the pig doesn't get any fatter, and instead gets thinner.
I'll BTC @ the Getgo, first "thing" in the morning, if you call me so I don't sleep in. You can trust me on that.:-))
>>
NEW YORK (AP) -- ''Hannibal,'' the most anticipated book of the summer, arrives Tuesday, promising to chill readers with the return of the horrific Dr. Lecter.

Author Thomas Harris plans to promote this long-awaited literary event by doing -- absolutely nothing.

No interviews. No book-signings. No Oprah, no Rosie. No ''Good Morning America,'' no ''Late Night with Conan O'Brien.''

The only place fans can hear Harris' voice is on the book's audiotape version: He reads his own work.

The mind behind Lecter, the erudite serial-killing menace, has turned down scads of interview requests in connection with his first book in 11 years.

Why? Carole Baron, former editor-in-chief at Harris' publisher Delacorte Press, asked him that question.

''He said that all he has to say is in his books,'' Baron said.

Harris' legendary reticence has done little to quell the public's demand for another visit from Hannibal Lecter, who enjoys a robust red wine and some fava beans with his -- well, maybe not HIS -- liver.

''This is THE hot summer read,'' said James Marcus, editor of literature and fiction at Amazon.com., which first started receiving online orders for the book in April.

''Harris is very publicity-shy,'' Marcus continued. ''But I think he's got a large and very loyal audience.''

His publisher agrees. Delacorte has an initial printing of 1.2 million for the book, which Harris delivered in March. Four days before its release, it was already the best-selling book at Amazon -- based strictly on orders.

At the author's request, no advance copies of the book were released, although some details are known.

Hannibal the cannibal, after mounting a grisly escape at the end of the first book, ''The Silence of the Lambs,'' has been enjoying his freedom the last seven years.

One of his surviving victims, intent on luring Lecter out of hiding, kidnaps his ''Silence'' foil -- FBI agent Clarice Starling -- to use as bait. More bodies are expected.

That's it. Nothing more than that simple synopsis leaked out until this week, when the Internet magazine Salon reported that Lecter and Clarice wind up as a couple.

That lack of information is fine with Harris. Even the author's ''Who's Who'' listing is minimalist: four lines, not even a full birthdate (b. 1940), a simple recitation of his career as a journalist at The Associated Press and his three previous novels.

Harris bolted the AP after 1975's ''Black Sunday,'' a collaboration with two fellow news agency workers. He followed that with 1981's ''Red Dragon,'' which introduced Lecter, and 1988's ''Silence of the Lambs.''

Contrast Harris' behavior with the fanfare that greeted last year's big book event, Tom Wolfe's ''A Man in Full.'' Wolfe, resplendent in his three-piece white suit, graciously sat for magazine, television and newspaper interviews. He invited questioners into his Upper East Side home.

He was, in short, ubiquitous. Harris, on the other hand, is invisible. Wolfe's book ended up beneath Christmas trees; Harris' tome is more likely headed for the beach.

So is Harris. The author splits his time between homes in Long Island's Sag Harbor and Miami.<<



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (61007)6/7/1999 8:31:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Amazon.com's 10 million customers include those who have either
purchased merchandise from Amazon.com or participated in its
auctions business.


Need I say more....



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (61007)6/7/1999 12:46:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
This number masks a deceleration in Amazon's growth and a shift in the number to include auction participants. The number of registered "customers" has grown from about 3.2 million in June of '98 to 4.4 mil in Sept (38%), 6.5 in Dec (47%), 8.2 mil in March '99 (25%), and maybe 10.5 at the end of this month (28%). There are a couple of things wrong with considering this number a continuous progression from last year's lofty growth rate: The aggregate growth rate has declined from previous rates before acquisitions took place. Auction activity includes many bidders who are only fishing for low prices and don't buy. And auction sales generate only a fraction of the revenue as direct sales - Amazon collects about 4%-5% per auction dollar.

Without the addition of registered auction "customers", Amazon would likely report much smaller growth numbers. Amazon does not break out their sales or make-up of registered customers so attaching much importance to this "news" makes little sense. In any case, this report "seems hollow" and is unlikely to have much impact on analysts or investors thinking. If Amazon were to break out their sales and define the number of auction customers, then the report would be able to be analyzed more clearly. The only reason for them not to do so, despite their protestation that this would give competitors useful information, (come on, competitors can extrapolate this stuff as needed), is to keep the growth clouded in mystery so as to delude investors, IMO.