SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bald Eagle who wrote (10922)6/7/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: Adam Nash  Respond to of 19080
 
I consider the analogy that the Database can be thought of as a platform for development, just like an OS.

So, enterprise applications, which are largely developed over databases, are the applications over the platform.

Oracle, is trying to be both the platform and applications vendor, which I guess has worked extremely well for Microsoft.

The difference that I worry about is that Oracle may inadvertantly force the rest of the ERP/M industry to focus on developing for SQL Server, in order to avoid bringing in business for their competitor.



To: Bald Eagle who wrote (10922)6/7/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: Hardly B. Solipsist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19080
 
The RDBMS is used as substrate by lots of enterprise applications
vendors. That's the sense in which Oracle is a "platform vendor".
It is a problem for Oracle that they compete with some of their
biggest customers. LE acknowledged some of this problem at the
meeting last week, and said that Oracle consulting would stop
competing with the big 5 consulting firms, since these firms
recommend database products. If Oracle wants to be in the apps
business this seems inevitable, but I've heard people claim that they
currently lose more in apps vendors pushing competing databases than
they make in selling their own applications. I have no idea if this
is true, or if true, how long it will remain the case.