SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: B.K.Myers who wrote (5926)6/7/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: J.L. Turner  Respond to of 9818
 
Thanks B.K.,I thought it was 20% or less.I am still interested in getting some feedback on the "success testing" issue.
J.L.T.



To: B.K.Myers who wrote (5926)6/7/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: flatsville  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
B.K.--I can't get the URL to work, but I noticed it indicates some sort of date--sep 95 96--?

Anyway, everything I've ever read indicated that approximately 17% of U.S. electric generation is dependent on nuclear. (Still searching for the source in my files.) It's hard to believe that the percentage of nuclear electricity generation increase from 7% to 17% in a period of 3 years. Perhaps it is one of those "urban myths."

In some geographic areas the dependency on nuclear generation is much higher than the national average. My understanding in the greater Chicagoland area is about 40% dependent.

Now if I could just figure out how to "short" Chicago...

(For those of your using Chicago Board of Options Exchange for delayed time quotes be aware the site has behaved badly for about two weeks. It is unreliable. For example, more often than not when I input a correct stock tic or index symbol the response indicates that the symbol is "not found" or some such b.s. You may have to type in the symbol repeatedly or go to the home page (cboe.com) click a hot link for one of the indices, then you can get the quote desired. Very weird.)