Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (52192)	6/7/1999 8:25:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I know a set up when I see one. >> Try to put your paranoia aside for a bit willya. That was a very impressive although long winded speech. But again you seem to have ignored the question .<It is politically correct to object to any reference to obeying men >> Oh spare me the political correct crap ok ? This isn't about political correctness It's about are Muslim women to be ground under the boot of Muslim men? <<<<Note: here you see a reference from God to obey women>> >> Well.... I'll take your word for it but we know that isn't the issue. What I have seen so far are the words "Men are in charge of women" right from your holy book Since as usual you have refrained from answering the question.....I'll try again <<Men are in charge of women, because Allah had made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend their property (for the support of women). Good women are obedient. .>> Care to comment on this passage from your holy book. Please don't rattle on about other stuff this is the passage I want to see you defend.What does it mean, explain if you can how it does not subjugate women to the will of Muslim men.... I await your reply ...with.. mild interest. pez