Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DaiTN who wrote (2462)	6/7/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: LORD ERNIE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2909

Does anyone of you know what is the matter with JM. Is he sick??? His last message on all the treads he is on was of the 28th. And he never answered on a private message I send hem on the 29th.

To: DaiTN who wrote (2462)	6/7/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: Jorjenzak	Respond to of 2909

Thanks for the reply and explaination Tom! Still sucks that it worked out the way it did and I am sure there will still be hard feelings but at least you stood up to the plate and did what needed to be done in response to the concerns posted here. In the future, be sure to alert folks sooner and try to confirm that notification is rec'd, as it was not by rickf obviously as he had already left for LV! This is simply a bump in the road and a valuable learning process. GO BETT!!! GO TOM!!!

To: DaiTN who wrote (2462)	6/7/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: steveK.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2909

DaiTn-could you please post Tom's reply to you on the RB "ROUND" board.Would really appreciate that.It seems like this was a case of a simple misunderstanding,and that mngmt. did attempt to rectify with those that RSVP'd to Anita Goldberg(IR)re:attending the meeting.If they did realize that a ballroom of that size was not practical(due to the # of RSVP's )it does make some sense.It also seems like Tom tried to transport people to the new site.Oh well,it is unfortunate nonetheless to some.It would be a shame if this darkened BETT's image.At this point,I give Tom the benefit of the doubt.Still long- Scooby-any feedback for us yet? Happy Returns- stevek.

To: DaiTN who wrote (2462)	6/8/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	Respond to of 2909

Hi Dai, Well I just got in this morning. Caught the 1115 red eye out of Vegas last night. Now I know why they call it the red eye.;-( Boy what folks will do to save a buck.;-) Well I thought everyone knew the reason for the move. I asked Tom when he called me up on Wed of last week and that is the same answer that he gave me. The company was expecting 500 folks but that didn't materialize. It only made good sense to move it to a new location, although I think I would of picked a better location. In any case I think it went well. Glad to have met you. Later, Ron