SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lkj who wrote (26197)6/8/1999 12:38:00 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 77400
 
Tuesday June 8, 8:05 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

ADVISORY/Cisco Will Team with Various Companies to Demonstrate Optical Solutions in the Backbone

WHO: Cisco Systems, Inc. and CIENA, Pirelli, Monterey Networks, Corvis, and Optical Networks

biz.yahoo.com



To: lkj who wrote (26197)6/8/1999 4:06:00 PM
From: Nichols  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77400
 
Funny- Sold CSCO? thinking of selling LU? I just sold my ORCL this morning!(only had small position) and I am definitely going to pump up my CSCO. CSCO is by far my largest holding (also hold LU). Had it since 1996. I liked it then- I love it now. Where in the world could you find a better story than CSCO? Certainly we are aware that there are no sure things out there. But CSCO still has tremendous growth potential, with, IMHO, little downside risk. I look for 3 things when I purchase a stock. #1- Management, #2-Industry, #3- Position in Industry. Ok- Their leader is the best, they are in an exploding industry and they have a near monopoly in that industry. Enough said?



To: lkj who wrote (26197)6/8/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: ftmp  Respond to of 77400
 
selling lu or csco to buy orcl
is like cutting the flowers and watering the weeds



To: lkj who wrote (26197)6/9/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
OT: LU, ORCL, tech stocks, and safe havens:

For me, the choice is CSCO vs. cash, or CSCO vs. a hammered-down non-tech, like an oil driller. RIG is the only thing I've bought in May and June. January through March, the only things I bought were SAP 2001 calls, and index puts. I've done a lot more selling than buying, and have been 40% cash since I sold all my CSCO at 117.

With the long bond at 6%, now is not the time to be buying growth stocks. If the techs sell off, they'll all go together, and ORCL will not be a safe haven. If anything, the highest-quality companies (csco, lu, intc, amat, msft, sap, dell) will weather the storm better, and recover quicker. But everything on that list is absurdly overvalued, with the possible exception of SAP.

Slim pickins for GARP investors. I think I'll wait till after the Fed raises, when the dow is at 9000 or so.



To: lkj who wrote (26197)6/16/1999 7:40:00 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Khan: OT, re Oracle:

I hope you ignored my recent advice, and bought Oracle. I'm just hoping this indicates Y2K is going to have a negligible effect on corporate software buying plans, so my SAP does well. Article:

June 16, 1999

Oracle Says Profit Rose 31%
In Its Fiscal Fourth Quarter
By LEE GOMES
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Oracle Corp. said strong sales of its key database-software line caused net income to handily beat expectations, easing Wall Street's fears about the bellwether technology company's outlook.

For its fiscal fourth quarter ended May 31, the Redwood Shores, Calif., software company reported net income of $527.4 million, or 36 cents a diluted share, up 31% from the $402.8 million, or 27 cents a diluted share, of a year earlier. Analysts had expected the company to earn 32 cents a share, according to First Call. Sales rose 22% to $2.94 billion from $2.41 billion.

The quarter is traditionally the strongest for Oracle, whose database and related product lines make it the world's second-largest software company after Microsoft Corp. But after Oracle reported slower-than-usual growth for its fiscal third quarter, there were widespread concerns that it might disappoint investors again this time.

Shares of Oracle surged Wednesday, rising $7.8125, or 31%, to close at $32.9375 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Analysts at Goldman Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co. and others raised their ratings on the stock before the market opened.

Wall Street jitters increased earlier Tuesday, when the company confirmed that it plans to eliminate about 325 employees, or less than 1% of its work force of about 43,000, as it reorganizes operations to take advantage of the Internet. In Nasdaq Stock Market trading Tuesday before its results were announced, Oracle's shares dipped $1.3125, or 5%, to $25.125.

But after the release of the quarterly report, shares rose in after-hours trading to $29.50.

In the most telling statistic, the company said database sales rose 25%, a figure well ahead of the 20% increase that even the most optimistic analysts had been expecting. "That's a huge surprise," said Rob Tholemeier, with the FAC/Equities division of First Albany Corp. "They found business that no one knew was out there."

Puzzled Analysts

Some analysts were puzzled by Oracle's strong showing, since the company had spent the last few weeks advising them to be cautious in their forecasts. Some even complained privately that Oracle had deliberately lowered expectations to get a spike in the stock when it surprised them with the good news. Indeed, shares are expected to be up again Wednesday as a result of the earnings release.

Jeffrey O. Henley, the company's chief financial officer, said in an interview that Oracle had been forced to be conservative by the uncertainties associated with the year 2000 date change. The Y2K problem has forced many corporate computer buyers to evaluate their product plans, and a Y2K-related slowdown has hurt Oracle competitors in business application programs that run along with databases.

But Mr. Henley said that in the end, database sales growth returned to its historic pattern. He also said that sales across the company's businesses looked as if they were going to hold up well during the next few months. "We feel very good," he said.

While other parts of Oracle's business did not show the surprising strength of its database line, they still had numbers that analysts considered respectable. Sales of the company's application programs, which have been erratic for several quarters, grew 28% from the year-earlier period. Oracle's revenue from consulting services rose 22%.

Role in E-Commerce

Oracle has embarked on an all-fronts campaign in recent weeks to get both investors and business customers excited again about the company, with executives frequently mentioning the role that Oracle's software plays in Internet e-commerce sites.

After Tuesday's announcement, Oracle Chief Executive Lawrence Ellison boasted in a news release that the company was growing faster than application-software rivals such as SAP AG and PeopleSoft Inc. He also said that Oracle's database product line was holding its own against onslaughts from both Microsoft and International Business Machines Corp.

But analysts noted that sales to conventional customers like banks still account for a much bigger portion of Oracle's revenue than new e-commerce applications. And they still have some near-term concerns, including whether Oracle's aggressive sales force can continue to operate at the intensity apparent during the most recent period.

"The fourth quarter is an important one for Oracle, and they always work hard to pull it off, with the phone lines open until midnight," said Robert Austrian of NationsBanc Montgomery Securities. "They'll sprint to the finish, and then have to go to the off-season for a bit of recuperation."

Another concern was whether Oracle, and other companies, might be undone later in the year, should companies slow their spending because of year-2000 preparations. But Rick Sherlund of Goldman, Sachs said that the strong database business at Oracle was an indication that the corporate software market might not see a Y2K-related slowdown after all.