SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lws who wrote (11950)6/8/1999 2:34:00 PM
From: MHS  Respond to of 27311
 
LWS,

This really getting OT, but equally relevant to the discussion is why did Xerox ignore the PARC technology when it could have been Apple and MS both? Let's face it, they had it before any of IBM, Apple or MS. Sometime the market (and companies) can not see what is before them because it is out of their frame of reference.

mhs



To: lws who wrote (11950)6/8/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Dennis V.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
lws, Yahoo alert. One of the cast-in-concrete, corporate types is quoting you out of context. (G)



To: lws who wrote (11950)6/9/1999 2:24:00 AM
From: john t. brice  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
lws> <<<<<<< Maybe there is some sort of poison pill in the Valence by-laws>>>>>>
I asked Dave Archibald that question 2-3 years ago and was told flatly, 'no'. I would guess that we would have found out about it if some provision had been made since then, then again this is VLNC.

duckster


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News