SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RG who wrote (32194)6/8/1999 10:48:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
>>>>this company cannot make it IMO...<<<<

ike,
You are suggesting that Bid.com investors on this board will be bankrupt because Bid.com will be bankrupt, are you not? I have just notified the SEC about your post. In my opinion your post is slanderous to the company and you have absolutely no information to qualify your statement so that it is based on fact.


RG, you surely can't be serious. You notified the SEC over THAT statement?



To: RG who wrote (32194)6/9/1999 8:47:00 AM
From: re3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
Well, all the best to bids / bid com investors, whether long or short...
I won't be posting any more, this is just to inform you all of that...i may add that i thought IMO stood for in my opinion...maybe i am misinformed...

good luck with all stock picks...



To: RG who wrote (32194)6/9/1999 9:49:00 AM
From: IceShark  Respond to of 37507
 
I have just notified the SEC about your post. In my opinion your post is slanderous to the company and you have absolutely no information to qualify your statement so that it is based on fact.

You do a great impression of the north end of a south bound jackass. Please keep us informed how the SEC case goes.



To: RG who wrote (32194)6/9/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
Hi RG,

I agree with you about that Ike Godsey character. Pretty shady if you ask me. I hear that he sold cigarettes to John Boy.

Though I would defer to your superior legal knowledge, my understanding is that "slander" is the spoken word and injurious false statements made in writing are "libel". It would seem that in order to convince the SEC that you have identified somebody that needs some looking into and that you are qualified to identify such people, you would want to use the correct legal terms.

BTW: the other part of the legal argument is that it would have to be injurious. With BIDS up 1/8 it may be difficult to prove this.

Also BTW: Does the SEC handle slander and libel cases? or is that usually handled by normal civil courts?

Just some things to think about,
JXM



To: RG who wrote (32194)6/9/1999 8:14:00 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
I have just notified the SEC about your post.

Wow you mean you have notified, the Small Edgy Chipmunks about ike's post, hey the chipmunks are already edgy from too much coffee and No Doz, don't risk sending them into a full fledged panic attack.

Please keep us all informed as to how the case goes. Ho Ho Ho



To: RG who wrote (32194)6/10/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: re3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
Good day, RG...

i have had a day or so to try to 'cool off'...however, i'd like to request that you kindly answer this question :

did you really notify the SEC about 'my post' ?

thank you for your time

ikegodsey