SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (10825)6/8/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29970
 
Greg, for all practical purposes, the 50 home splits will allow greater bandwidth for the fifty homes in the existing head end channel slot(s) being served by the present system.

But it doesn't do anything to add more slots for other ISPs. It's a box thing. It merely reduces the level of congestion for existing users of the original system.

It doesn't add to the lane count in and out of the head end, and to the routers in the WAN. Of course, this could be seen to facilitate multiple ISPs operating over the same channel, but for some reason I don't think that this would work very well where the larger players were concerned. It's physically possible, but adminstratively prohibitive, and would get very tight over time. Unless the parties could reach some extraordinary terms.

But even sharing the same channel would only be suitable for basic 'net access, surfing, email, etc. The moment either ISP wanted to put in messaging or security enhancements, or invoke multimedia capabilities such as those which DOCSIS will permit, there would be problems with coexisting, immediately. To do it right, the engineers would have to go back to the drawing boards on this one. The MSOs never seriously considered this to be a possibility, and if they did consider it at one time, then they certainly put in enough inhibitors to avoid having to deal with it for a while.

Regards, Frank Coluccio