Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (5874)	6/8/1999 9:00:00 PM
From: dreamer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

If no one can see that then I apologize for being a bully. But the arbitrage until resolved makes this stock extremely limited If you can't see that then I guess there is going to be some people upset when it is resolved.. Is it your opinion that the only way for the arbitrage to be stopped has to be done in a way that will upset the W holder's?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (5874)	6/8/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: Dowgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

Hello Everybody..... Isn't this "comment period" for Midland taking just a little too long. I think it's time that the Midland Shareholders tried to apply just a little e-mail pressure on NASDAQ to wind up this "jumping through hoops" period and let us get on with trading our stock. We are all sitting on assets ..... am I wrong in saying that MIDL is worth in the area of 24 cents each (based on 16+million common) and the MIDLP over $10.00 with the CBQI stock Midland holds....and those figures are with CBQI at only $3.00. I'm not selling my MILDP for 10 cents on the dollar..... Add to that a company coming in someday and an increase in the price of CBQI..... Hopefully we will all have smiles on our faces again. With that said.... anyone who wants to sell their P's, think twice. Now lets use our combined efforts and request that NASDAQ expedite their efforts to get this stock trading as soon as possible. Best to all, Serena

To: Ga Bard who wrote (5874)	6/9/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: Marshall W.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

Gary: You were being very reactionary and really down on warrant holders. Even though I was calling a spade a spade when I described your actions, I too was being reactionary and out of character by being so direct. I am sorry. Just a few posts later, I notice that you were "back in the saddle again" and making your very able efforts to study the problem. Thanks. I STILL SAY THAT ONE SAFETY IS TO HOLD ALL INVESTMENTS IN ONE"S PERSONAL NAME, RATHER THAN STREET NAME. THIS REDUCEDS THE AVAILABLE INVESTMENTS (P, C, W) which can be borrowed. Best, Marshall W. Yes, we, the warrant holders, do understanding the problem but just do not want to be wiped off of the map.