Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: W Tell who wrote (19899)	6/8/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: mineman	Respond to of 26850

If there are no gem quality stones over $40 a carat management will be able to say that only half of the sample has been tested and the other half probably contain the gem quality stones. Good trick!!

To: W Tell who wrote (19899)	6/8/1999 9:56:00 PM
From: mineman	Respond to of 26850

The June 8th Street-wire says Winspear "ultimately confirmed" Kaiser's "contention" that 75% of the value was contained in 3 large stones, whereas the truth is that Winspear deceptively kept this material information from the public for months and only reluctantly admitted it after Kaiser revealed it in his newsletter!!

To: W Tell who wrote (19899)	6/8/1999 9:59:00 PM
From: mineman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

For 6 months management have not allowed the 3 gem quality stones to be analyzed by an independent diamond expert to determine if they were added to the sample from another property! Perhaps the stones will be analyzed in the future - by a Royal Canadian Mounted Police gem expert.