Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REW who wrote (30612)	6/8/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

The RB post needed to be put here twice? This thread is going downhill faster than TSIG is when RB posts are better than SI posts. Oops, sorry, that might be construed as a bash. BTW, I bought some DELL today. That thread is hopping compared to this one. But then, they are a REAL company making real revenue and profits. Back to lurking.

To: REW who wrote (30612)	6/8/1999 10:44:00 PM
From: REW	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Followup from RB poster By: pairwize Reply To: 11002 by Mr._Moto Tuesday, 8 Jun 1999 at 10:28 PM EDT Post # of 11021 PP comments mr moto: I have followed this PP from its inception and believe that I understand the terms and conditions quite well. For all intents and purposes it is floorless (although not strictly so) and I agree with those who have speculated that some of the pp investors have diluted this stock. In other words, SC and others from SI has provided some sound analysis of the pp and I dispute little of what he says about it (although I could certainly nit-pick some points). It reflects desperate measures for desperate times. Thus, although the terms of the pp were far from ideal it was all that was available. No PP (on those terms) = no company. In this sense, it was good because the company survives with business plan intact, albeit trimmed and streamlined as of late. In my opinion, our focus must shift from PP issues and stock price to marketing and execution. Revenues / profits will make the pp a moot subject if the company strategy comes to fruition. I see no reason why it won't. Knowing what I know about the pp and business plan, I continue to hold. In fact, if one buys the argument that the pp folks have diluted the stock and lowered it's price, which I do, then one should also realize that the price has been artificially deflated, so to speak. Thus, anyone who argues that the pp has caused price deflation must also realize that it is a buy opportunity (considering price trends and other factors, obviously can't consider "earnings ratios", etc.). However, please don't construe my comments as a recommendation -- many other factors would need to be considered. JJ