SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Internet Guru Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harmon - analyst who wrote (1849)6/9/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4337
 
Steve,

In the U.S., much if not most of the updating and replacement of non-compliant programs, packages, and hardware is already done. So there should be no surge in orders of any kind as we move closer to the end of the year. If anything, there will be a big drop in IT business for the remainder of the year because all changes from this point on require very thorough testing in order to pass the much stricter than usual QA procedures that will be in place until year end at least. Mostly, only emergency or critical business changes will occur from this point on.

Wayne



To: steve harmon - analyst who wrote (1849)6/10/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4337
 
Steve, re:y2k - investors who do their homework will find that y2k effect began jan. 1, 1999 and certainly june, 1999 as accounting and budgeting software (and other forecasting software) is already doing year 2000 analysis and number crunching

so y2k is not waiting for dec. 31, 1999, it's already here among us and the lights are still on, computers still running


Doesn't the Y2K problem have to do with recognizing the current date? Even non-compliant systems get that right in 1999.
As for accounting and budgeting software (and other forecasting software), what about three and five year plans. Using your logic, the problem should have been encountered years ago. <g>



To: steve harmon - analyst who wrote (1849)6/11/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: UpUpNOA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4337
 
Steve, why are analysts lambasting barnsandnoble.com (bnbn)? It seems like a good buy at its current price of $16. Do you believe the future looks bright for this ticker, or will it follow in egghead.com's (eggs) footsteps?

By the way, thanks for your reply on the millennium malfunction.

UpUpNOA