Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (1727)	6/9/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: Laurens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Some fine sleuth work Sid. I guess (true) financials would not yield such a "positive story" as the new hypster wrote up.

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (1727)	6/9/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 2513

Yes Sid, obviously Wall Street Corner and Conservative Speculator are linked. Obviously the distinction Con.Spec. CEO Oakley insists upon is highly questionable. I don't buy it either. Still legally, he may well have it sewn up in his favor. Someone should dig to see if Con Spec EVER recommends anything that Wall Street Corner hasn't been paid to tout- if it does that would help the claim of separation. If Con Spec recommends ALL or even most stocks Wall Street Corner is paid to tout, then all the legal manueverings in the world shouldn't help CEO Oakley IMHO. If, on the other hand, he only recommends a few of the stocks he is paid to tout through Wall Street Corner, and Wall Street Corner charges a consistent price to all for it's touts...then he could say he only puts his personal blessing only on the ones that please him via his own review, and perhaps be in the clear...but I would think such a situation as this would make those companies who aren't picked for a Con Spec. blessing feel a bit shortchanged as the understanding of this situation gets around. That's got to be bad for WSCorner business I would think. At any rate, I don't know that it is "in fact the case" that Con. Spec. was paid to put out the report as you say- According to Con. Spec. you are wrong. But it sure is a mess. What a mess. I agree...Dcht should NOT be tempted by such schemes- but then, for all I know they are unaware of the situation- unlikely perhaps, but I sure would hope so. Dan B