SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Malloy who wrote (83121)6/9/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 186894
 
Brian M. - <This [Jubak] was last weeks take.>

You're right. Here is Jubak's latest take on INTC

moneycentral.msn.com
======================================================================
.....
Why it made the '50 Best' list
First, I've really found it helpful to review why these stocks are on this list. Memory gets fuzzy and if you're not careful, you can wind up focusing on the wrong qualities of a stock and worrying about the wrong problems. Take Intel (INTC), for example. Exactly why is it on the "50 Best" list? Well, I'm certainly not indifferent to the company's incredible 80%-plus market share for the chips that run personal computers, and I do believe that it would take Intel quite a while to lose control of that market. But market share alone isn't the competitive advantage that puts Intel on this list.

It's on the list because the company has, by intelligently using the profits that resulted from that amazing market share, become one of the world's great manufacturers. Intel's factories are so much more efficient than anyone else's that the company can keep competitors starved for earnings, and the higher profits Intel generates from its factories get plowed back into newer plants with even more-efficient technology.

National Semiconductor (NSM) recently pulled out of this market because it wasn't generating enough of a return from its current chip-making business to finance the investment it needed in the next generation of chip-making equipment to keep up with Intel. Advanced Micro Devices' (AMD) soon-to-be released chips may be as fast or faster than Intel's, but the company can't manufacture them efficiently enough to make them a serious threat to its big competitor. (For more on why I like Intel right now, see my June 4 column "Extra! Extra! Looking past the gloom and doom.")
...
======================================================================

PB