Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Sepracor-Looks very promising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quidditch who wrote (3273)	6/9/1999 10:04:00 AM
From: scaram(o)uche	Respond to of 10280

Re.: Ira M. Steven..... Chuckle. No, we don't need a Czar. Hillary already tried that. I'm just frustrated with all of the rumor mongering without additional data. A combo of good management and good science/drugs wins in the end. I'd recommend that anyone who is feeling a bit shaky take the time to go through the AGPH thread from beginning to end. It details the battle with a [largely ethical] Merck and, subsequently, with [largely unethical] shorts and rumor mongers. The emphasis, from those who believed in Peter Johnson et al., was to keep one's eye on the DATA. It worked. Disclaimer.... until JNJ and the rumor mongers, not the DATA, caused this crash, I had never owned a single share of SEPR. I still don't. I hold some 01/01 calls that were purchased after the crash, and near-term volatility is not a concern. Rick