Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fli-by who wrote (2498)	6/9/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: DaiTN	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2909

Fli, The sell off has nothing to do with me. People sell because they expect to hear big news and big numbers bringing back from the meeting, but it did not happened(like I.J. said, it's not what they hear, but because of what they don't hear). Also because all the rumors going on on Raging Bull board. But needless to say, I don't give a ..#@ if it was because of me, I speak the truth, and if someone don't like what I said, let them sell. Dai

To: Fli-by who wrote (2498)	6/9/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: SCOOBEY-DO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2909

Hi Fli, You wrote: >>>DaiTN, ... That was a very heavy report you wrote. I sent Tom an e-mail asking why some of the items you mentioned were never brought to our attention(dropped agreements etc.) I was actually disturbed(not at you)about the things you wrote. Thats why we had a pretty big selloff Monday. 3-1 I think steve said.<<< I have called Tom on various occasions in the past regarding press releases that didn't seem to materialize. He told me what I probably already knew. I didn't feel that it would do anyone any good to point out the fact that some projects didn't go anywhere. When I mentioned this to Anita Goldberg, she said that I probably should have let the thread know. My feelings are that this is a start up company that needs to find it's way. The drop in the stock price on Monday may have been the eight shareholders that were left at Alexis Park with rick f due to lack of communication. I don't like the fact that, if BETT's price goes up to $3 and stays there for xxx days before September, ET&T will get xxx additional shares. With that cloud hanging over BETT's price, I don't think that the price will go above $3 until after the agreement expires, if it does. If the stock goes from $0.50 to $2.50, that is still a four bagger. There are flaws in BETT's set-up. That is why it is selling at $0.50 rather than $5 or $10. These flaws will be worked out over time. Getting the price higher quickly is more of a concern to Tom than to me. I am willing to wait. Tom, I am not being critical of you. I am behind you all the way. It is just a kind of rough road that we are on. I will do anything that I can to help smooth out the road so that we can all FLY. Go BETT!! Go Tom!! Scoobey

To: Fli-by who wrote (2498)	6/9/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: Ronald P. Margraf Sr.	Respond to of 2909

Hi Fli by, The sell off wasn't because something didn't happen at the meeting, it happend because everyone else took a hit. Everyone. It is called profit taken. It has been up now for the last two days. I will continue. Slow but steady with profit taking in the mean time.;-))))) Don't mean to get on your case but you will see this for the next several weeks. Get use to it. Just watch the charts. Let them lead to to profitability.;-)))) Later, Ron