SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Winston Lee who wrote (61374)6/9/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
1) AMZN can easily make money (if it wanted) by vc business. It already has huge
unrealized gains in drugstore.com and other companies, if they were to go IPO.
However, AMZN is engaging in vc to improve its strategic business, not be a CMGI (I
hate CMGI!)


IPOs in the nets are not doing well.

2) The most important number that investors should be focusing on is not EPS, but free
cash flow. AMZN's EPS is similar to its free cash flow, but in case of Barnes & Noble
and other retailers, free cash flow is significantly less than EPS, in many cases negative.
The beauty of AMZN's model is that when it kicks into gear, the free cash flow number
will go through the roof.


Actually, the business model has chaned to carry lots of inventory. Why will the free cash flow go through the roof???

Glenn



To: Winston Lee who wrote (61374)6/9/1999 4:51:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>in case of Barnes & Noble and other retailers, free cash flow is significantly less than EPS, in many cases negative.

You are right. B&N has never generated free cash. The bears here should have focused long ago on fundamentals of cash flow and return on investment.