Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trinity Energy Resources, Inc. (TRGC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenny who wrote (561)	6/9/1999 2:40:00 PM
From: Dr. Nose	Respond to of 945

Thanks Kenny! It appears that we're not just collecting dust anymore. n

To: Kenny who wrote (561)	6/10/1999 10:08:00 AM
From: Dr. Nose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 945

World Bank, In Boost To Chad, May Back Exxon-Led Oil Venture By Michael M. Phillips, Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal WASHINGTON -- The World Bank is close to endorsing a $3.5 billion oil-field and pipeline project linking wells in Chad to Cameroon's Atlantic coast. If its board gives the go-ahead, the bank would lend $190 million and assemble $300 million in commercial-bank loans for the central African project. The venture's lead private sponsor, Exxon Corp., said World Bank support is essential for its continued participation in the project, which is opposed by environmental and human-rights activists. Exxon would operate the field and pipeline, and own about 40% of the venture. Royal Dutch/Shell Group would own a similar share, with Elf Aquitaine SA taking a smaller stake. The governments of Chad and Cameroon would hold very small equity stakes, financed by $90 million in World Bank loans. The bank's private-sector financing arm, the International Finance Corp., would provide $100 million and organize the larger syndicated commercial loan. "This project could transform the economy of Chad, now one of the world's poorest countries, provided public revenues are managed properly and the natural and human environments are protected," bank staff wrote in an internal document. Senior bank staff have decided to back the project, and, in a private meeting recently, World Bank President James D. Wolfensohn told environmentalists that he is leaning toward the staff position. If he gives his approval, the loan could go to the board around mid-September. The project presents a quandary for Mr. Wolfensohn, who wasn't available for comment on Friday. On the one hand, it would generate $80 million to $100 million in annual revenue for Chad, a desperately poor, landlocked country. Cameroon would earn some $20 million annually from the pipeline. On the other hand, Mr. Wolfensohn has declared his intention to use the World Bank to address often-ignored issues of human rights and corruption. Chad and Cameroon have dubious reputations in both departments. In fact, the government of Chad briefly jailed a member of parliament for charging corruption in the oil deal, a move that provoked protests from foreign governments and the bank itself. The U.S., the largest single shareholder among the bank's 181 member nations, hasn't decided whether to support the loan. Bank officials acknowledge that the project is risky. But they and the oil companies argue that they have taken great pains to minimize the environmental damage and the dislocation of residents living along the path of the 600-mile-long pipeline. They have also pledged to ensure the revenue is spent on poverty-fighting programs. "We think that the oil revenue will really help the government alleviate poverty," says Aboulaye Beri, first counselor at the Chadian Embassy in Washington. Raymond Epote, charge d'affaires at the Embassy of Cameroon, declined to comment on the project.