SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (10880)6/9/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: E. Davies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
I wonder how many people take these two clowns seriously.
The thing that is most amazing is that the Fools have a surprising ability to get it right in the stock pick even though a lot of their commentary is way off base. Better to be right than smart I guess.
Eric



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (10880)6/9/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: DOUG H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29970
 
<<<<< I can't help but shake my head by looking at this crap from the Fools. The advent of the Fools in itself is a testimony for the current mania. I wonder how many people take these two clowns seriously.>>>>>>

Mohan,
What part of that statement do you diagree with and why? I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just want to learn. D.H.



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (10880)6/9/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
OFF TOPIC

The advent of the Fools in itself is a testimony for the current mania.

No. The advent of the Fools is a testimony to the potential of online, interactive publishing. It's public record that prior to the existence of AOL, the predecessor of the Motley Fool was nothing other than an inexpensive newsletter with a very short list of subscribers garnered primarily from a family wedding list. Without AOL, the advent of the Fool might not have happened.

Though I agree that the current mania has helped accelerate their success, there is no question in my mind that the Motley Fool would be successful in a recession or bear market. I don't agree with everything the company publishes, but I haven't found anybody or any organization that I do agree with entirely.

I wonder how many people take these two clowns seriously.

Count me in that camp.

Mohan, it's not polite to hide behind your anonymity, labelling people clowns when you probably don't know them and probably have never talked to them. I do know them and the only thing they have in common with clowns is their jester's hat.

I'd appreciate you being respectful of my friends in your public disagreement with them. They would extend you that courtesy. Thanks in advance.

--Mike Buckley