Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (11979)	6/9/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

There is no systematic institutional recommendation of VLNC by PW or Pru. The opposite was your message. No name calling needed to deflect scrutiny with my messages.

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (11979)	6/9/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Rich, first of all, the fact (if it is a fact) that 30% of the stock is held by clients of two brokerage firms does not mean those brokerages have "control of the stock" as claimed by FMK. The clients have control of the stock. By FMK's logic, 100% of the stock is "controlled" by a handful of brokerage firms. If you could just convince them not to sell any of those shares for less than $100, you'll soon be rich.

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (11979)	6/9/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: Chuck Lehman	Respond to of 27311

Rich, Maybe your friends can give us some insight into an important issue. If those two firms have clients with 30% of the outstanding shares it stands to reason that those same firms are the source for a significant number of the shares that are sold short. Can their brokers tell them who is shorting? Thanks, Chuck