Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DRKOOP.Com,Inc - (Nasdaq - KOOP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (160)	6/9/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: Jackie Ng	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 595

Anyone think KOOP is good for "long term" investment or just a short term trading stock?

To: Pluvia who wrote (160)	6/9/1999 9:46:00 PM
From: Jeff D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 595

Hello there PLUVIA - long time no see. Hark back to the infamous TLTK days on America Online; you exposed that one very well! Glad to see you're still at it. Guess we're on opposite sides of the fence here - or were; I sold this AM for 3.25 points. I actually didn't realize the financials were so negative, so it'll be interesting to see what happens.

To: Pluvia who wrote (160)	6/10/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 595

Pluvia, you responded to my statement below: <<So, Steve, why did CNBC just report KOOP as the second most active stock, trading into strength?>> with the following comment: >>>Trading into strength ??? What the heck does that mean? Sounds like your wish'n and hope'n.<<< You'll have to check with CNBC which gave the report using the phrases "second most active stock" and "trading into strength." I merely echoed what CNBC said. Your question rests with this media source, not me. At the time CNBC stated this, KOOP was trading up between two and three. You now stand corrected. It was not, as you stated, "wish'n and hope'n" on my part. It was what was reported.