SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : HIGH SPEED ACCESS {HSAC} -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pass pass who wrote (151)6/10/1999 2:08:00 AM
From: Goldbug Guru  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 963
 
The cable modem vs. DSL performance race

Though many areas of the United States are still stuck with the paltry transfer
rates of ISDN lines, affordable broadband Internet connections via cable
modems and some flavors of Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology have
begun to make their presence felt. In fact, in some areas of the country,
including the insulated world of Silicon Valley, where I (and InfoWorld)
reside, many communities are starting to get access to both. As a result,
some lucky small business and home users actually have a choice between
cable and DSL.

Inevitably, this has led to discussions about which one is better and which is
faster. From an end-user perspective, both services provide a fast,
always-on connection that differs only in their physical connections (although
even those are remarkably similar). Technologically, however, there are
some important differences in how the two types of connections handle the
data traffic. Cable modems use a shared access system, like an office
network, where all the traffic in a particular area (or neighborhood) travels
across a common connection. DSL modems, on the other hand, provide a
dedicated connection to the phone company's central office, but then share a
single pipe from that central point to the Internet itself.

But until recently, there hasn't really been any hard evidence that could
support these conclusions. Last week, however, Keynote Systems, a
company that tracks overall Internet and Web site performance through its
Keynote Business 40 and other services, released an intriguing set of
performance test results that compares the performance of cable modem
lines and DSL Lines.

The results of Keynote's month-long test show that -- at least for the specific
TCI/@Home cable modem connection vs. Pacific Bell DSL modem
connection it tested -- in the prime-time evening hours of home-based
Internet usage, a 384Kbps-guaranteed DSL line (which costs $49 a month,
including the ISP charges) was approximately 11 percent faster than a cable
modem connection (which costs $39 a month, including the ISP charges).
More important, the reason for the difference was because of the bandwidth
problems associated with a shared cable modem connection.

During the day, cable modems were actually 15 percent faster than DSL
lines, but in the evening, the cable modem rates slipped by 8 percent as
more users got onto the network. Interestingly, DSL lines improved by 17
percent during that same time period, because the phone line networks over
which DSL-based data is carried have less traffic in the evenings.



To: pass pass who wrote (151)6/12/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: Network Pukka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 963
 
I guess I will, since I started it and have a great deal of knowledge on this company.

n.p.