SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unclewest who wrote (22294)6/10/1999 8:13:00 AM
From: Allen champ  Respond to of 93625
 
RAMBUS inside ?

AMD K7 to launch 28 June at 600MHz (From Register)

Sources said that AMD will formally introduce its K7 processor on the 28th of June
and will have one processor running at 600MHz.

There will also be 500MHz and 550MHz flavours, as previously revealed.

Processors will ship to system integrators on the 3rd of August. In the first two weeks
of August, there will be volume shipments of the product, and at introduction time,
AMD will also have tier one vendors demoing machines based on the K7.

As you might expect, the K7 will not be called the K7. It could be called the Alereon
(see earlier story), but we hope to have more details on this later today.

In August, distributors will be carrying stocks of the product, we can confirm. The ramp
will be sufficient to supply some end user needs.

The K7 at 600MHz will be the first time AMD has ever introduced a processor which
beats an Intel chip.

The significance of this will not be lost on OEMs and PC manufacturers, who are likely
to queue up to use the processor. Gateway is a definite, and it is likely Compaq will
not be far behind.

Yesterday, AMD tried to persuade us to sign a non-disclosure agreement but instead
we decided to take the K7 challenge and accumulate info elsewhere.



To: unclewest who wrote (22294)6/10/1999 7:01:00 PM
From: George the Greek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
I'm not knowledgeable about shorting,
but when unclewest ran that little computation
of the "number of shares available to short",
it didn't make sense to me.

My understanding is that if shares
are held in street name,
brokerages can commingle them,
and lend them to shorts for short sale.

So, who's to say that the institutional holdings mentioned,
just by example, by uncle's reckoning, about 11.7 million shares,
is, so to speak, off the table,
and therefore actually and in fact unavailable to shorts?

Can someone clarify?

George