SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chris A. who wrote (19946)6/10/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: mineman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
McCallum was paid by Winspear and never told to determine if the 3 large gem-quality ones had the same "signature of origin" as the remaining ones, and was therefore not looking for this evidence.

It is a specialized task to determine the signature and one of the best "signature experts" in the world lives a few miles from Winspear's Vancouver office. But Winspear never contacted him after my revelations about his availability six months ago.

In fact management have refused to allow anyone to see the stones. What does this tell you?? It tells me that it's possible the SALTING may be known by the highest levels of the company for if they had nothing to hide they would have welcomed an independent analysis. Instead they have prevented it!!



To: Chris A. who wrote (19946)6/10/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: mineman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
The way nature works: 25 macro-diamonds fairly evenly distributed between $20/carat and $2,000/carat.

The way a SALTED sample works: 22 macro-diamonds all less than $50 per carat and 3 macros worth $2,000 per carat.