SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (52614)6/10/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 67261
 
Somebody else did it. But even the Democrats aren't buying it.

What are they going to argue?

***Media Research Center CyberAlert***
Thursday June 10, 1999 (Vol. Four; No. 103)


A week-and-a-half after he promised to fire Energy
Department officials whose incompetence exacerbated the espionage,
a promise he has yet to fulfill, Energy Secretary Bill Richardson
appeared before the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence. It
was an open hearing with cameras taping footage any network could
use, but only one bothered.

Richardson denounced the Senate-passed rules clamping down on
security and the committee's top Democrat castigated a Richardson
deputy for trying to falsely impugn others with language that
sounded like it was written at the "political shop over at the
White House." I only know this because of Carl Cameron's FNC story
which also revealed how FBI agents have accused Justice officials
of "deliberate incompetence" in ignoring evidence of espionage.

On the June 9 Special Report with Brit Hume, Cameron began by
pointing out how Richardson told Senators he opposes new security
proposals because they "undermine and micro-manage him."

Cameron moved on: "The chief of Energy Department counter-
intelligence, Ed Curran, accompanied Richardson and found himself
under fire for claiming several days ago that the Senate knew
about China's spying in 1996 and failed to act. The Vice Chairman
of the committee, Democrat Bob Kerrey, scolded Curran for being
both inaccurate and too partisan."
Kerrey: "It carried a tone that sounded as if it was written
by the political shop over at the White House."
Cameron: "Curran sat by and watched as his boss acknowledged
that the comments and the facts were wrong."


Cameron explained how the House unanimously passed new
security measures proposed in the Cox Report and then concluded
with exclusive information about more malfeasance:

"In rare closed door testimony, Fox News has learned that
frustrated rank and file FBI agents told lawmakers that they found
ample evidence of Chinese espionage but felt thwarted by senior
Justice Department officials. Now sources say law makers will look
into the possibility of what's called quote 'deliberate
incompetence' by Justice Department officials to sweep it under
the carpet."


FNC's 7pm ET Fox Report culled all this down to 38 seconds,
but that's still 38 seconds more than allocated by ABC, CBS, CNN
and NBC which all ignored these events of the day. CNN devoted
virtually all of The World Today to Kosovo and breaking news of a
peace deal wiped out Inside Politics. The other networks, however,
found time on June 9 for plenty of other stories:
-- ABC's World News Tonight looked at the boom in summer jobs
for teens and mental health treatment.
-- CBS Evening News dedicated pieces to the health dangers of
cigars, the "smoldering facts on cigars and health" as Dan Rather
put it, and "the weather team extreme," meteorologists who check
extreme weather claims. The Eye on America story examined racial
profiling by police.
-- NBC Nightly News, prompted by the launch of drkoop.com,
devoted the In Depth segments to online health information
followed by the efforts of a woman raising money to pay for an
experimental operation.



To: jlallen who wrote (52614)6/10/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<< What are they going to argue? >>

They don't have to argue anything. After the impeachment trial Bubba has a get home free card. Most people don't pay any attention to what is going on and don't care. Appointing an IC would just be perceived to be the mean Republicans playing dirty tricks.

I heard where the Senate invited Richardson to talk to them about the nuclear secrets and he turned them down flat.