Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Personal Contingency Planning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flatsville who wrote (854)	6/10/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: John Hunt	Respond to of 888

bearcub & flatsville I would go easy on the peroxide too ... I realize this is about the brain, but it also says hydrogen peroxide kills bacteria, viruses and also cells. Chemical Causes Alzheimer's Damage - Study dailynews.yahoo.com I guess one picks his/her favorite poison ... I am glad that I have my own well and a reverse-osmosis system for drinking water. (The RO removes most chemical compounds, but not all viruses and bacteria ... Will have to check the book as I am pretty sure it will remove chlorine) :-)) John

To: flatsville who wrote (854)	6/11/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: bearcub	Respond to of 888

flatsville: no, i don't have a website to cite re: h2o2's efficacy vs clorox debate. it is simply not on this machine i'm using now. i gave the sum and substance of my personal research and conclusions regardng that "debate" as you call it, in my post. my conclusions and stocking of 35% food grade H2O2 is directly in response to the investigation i did after the debate as you called it raged on some private y2k mailing list threads late last year to which i formerly subscribed, but now do not. the sum and substance of those debates reside on a desktop pc a very long ways from me physically now, as i'm totally reliant upon my new laptop now. assimilating the hard drive contents for accessibility & convenience of using this machinefor cyber communication is on my "eventually" list for late this fall. i applaud your openmindedness to check the debate out for yourself. i regret not being in a position to point you any where but to the two professional resources i quoted in my reply to c.k. houston, or to doing a quickie dogpile search for H2O2 however, allow me to point out one small but significant variance in your H2O2 assumption/questioning post and mine. you spoke of 0.035 H2O2, and my post was about .35 food grade H2O2; a much stronger solution by a factor of 10 logic compels me to point out 2 more things about H2O2: A-1) i have no problem putting .035% H2O2 on a cut etc for cleansing. A-2) i would have a bigger problem putting .35 H2O2 on a cut as it would burn me severely, making me wish i'd never thought of it. A-3) i would never consider putting .035 chlorox on any cut! The above has to do with the skin being an "absorber" more than any quantitative measure of pain quotient. so, no clorox here. And secondly, B-1)there is only one measly OXYGEN molecule differece between H2O2 and H2O, and absolute necessity for human existance.