Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : T/FIF Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Oravetz who wrote (955)	6/11/1999 9:49:00 AM
From: scaram(o)uche	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1073

Jim: Tried, through one crashed post last night and one this morning, to add 4 contracts for ZMLAF, the January 2001 calls. This is what it does to the SI portfolio maker at its best....... exchange2000.com Rick

To: Jim Oravetz who wrote (955)	6/15/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1073

Jim: FRX is now at the ask that I first saw after reading your suggestion, 44 3/4. You should have seen by now that I tried to work a "more leveraged" leaps play into the portfolio, but that it can't be done conveniently using the SI format. I'm therefore backing the calls out of the "neuro" portfolio........ exchange2000.com I like the idea of adding FRX, but I don't feel that it stays with the "highly leveraged" goal. Perhaps SEPR was also not in that "spirit", but..... too late. Thanks, very much, for the suggestion. It's in our best interests, IMO, to watch FRX closely. This is the second problem that we've encountered trying to use the SI format for real-world maintenance of a portfolio. If anyone wants to write the code for a better one (the SI manager is GREAT, if one could just make the needed changes to keep profit from rolling into the total for tax basis), maybe Go2net would pay for it??? Rick