Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (12025)	6/10/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: lws	Respond to of 27311

I know nothing about the rest of the stocks you mention, but it sounds like you're just day-trading the fractions in Valence if you've made any money at it -- at least recently. This stock's been trading in a rather tight little range. But I have no problem with trying to pick up the nickels & dimes if you can. Takes more trading skill than I've got, though... And it sure is a different matter than shorting the stock 'cause it's supposed to be a "fraud."

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (12025)	6/10/1999 10:40:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I really shouldn't waste this board's time responding to your personal attack, but since your attack is so badly flawed, I can't resist. "Mr. Yoest does not like my negative opinions about the Valence stock fraud." At least you correctly used the term OPINION, because that is all you have. Not one single fact to support your rantings about fraud. "Mr. Yoest hounds me endlessly and tries to discredit my other short picks." Endlessly? I've posted to you about a dozen times. Go ahead and waste your time counting them. "Mr. Yoest predicts that my short call of BTIM at 21 will certainly spell disaster." Your short pick was on March 31st around $15, the stock immediately jumped to $21. Nice timing. Look at a chart, caught rewriting history again! As to "certainly spell disaster", my exact words were "looks like Bill is going to lose a few pesos on this one too!" Seems you embellished that one a little, eh? "Not only does the Yoestman think that my short call of KERA (at 16) is wrong. He boldly proclaims that he will day-trade it. Note that he just managed to buy in near the end of the day at 13 1/4, just before it closed near the low. Nice day trade Robbie!" Thank you, I made a few quick bucks, it all adds up. Other than the fact that I posted at the exact time and price as I placed the trades, and the time/sale record confirms my prices, I can include a letter from my mom attesting to my integrity if you require further proof. "KERA is now at 9 and change" Who cares, I profitably day traded it 2 1/2 months ago. "Mr. Yoest...posting under the Yahoo handle "mgv2000" predicts that my short call on CCSI won't pan out." Oh, now I'm also every internet id that heckles you on the sites you post? Funny, you sound just like Visnic accusing a variety of individuals on this site of being MGV2000. "I've been shorting the Valence fraud at various prices above 7 1/2 and from where I'm sitting it looks like....yep, Robert is wrong AGAIN!" This statement really doesn't surprise me since it is a know medical fact that one's vision can be seriously impaired with one's head planted so far up one's ass. Truth stretching tally wexliar 4 Yoest 0