SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1287)6/10/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: Peter V  Respond to of 10293
 
Having just been to the VLNC thread, I have to note that if you are half as nervous as they say you are, you must be a wreck! I've seen them call you many things, but this is the first time I've seen "nervous schoolgirl" . . . LOL!

Please ask them to push VLNC over 8 again so I can take a crack at it. Thanks.

I looked at CVSN, it's a bit thinly traded for you, isn't it? Oooops, what am I saying? Look at ALTIF . . .

Anyway, I want a good market day to enter more shorts, with CMGI going in the tank, tomorrow may not be it.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1287)6/10/1999 10:43:00 PM
From: golden_tee   Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
Your attack is so badly flawed, I can't resist:
"Mr. Yoest does not like my negative opinions about the Valence stock fraud." At least you correctly used the term OPINION, because that is all you have. Not one single fact to support your rantings about fraud.
"Mr. Yoest hounds me endlessly and tries to discredit my other short picks." Endlessly? I've posted to you about a dozen times. Go ahead and waste your time counting them.
"Mr. Yoest predicts that my short call of BTIM at 21 will certainly spell disaster." Your short pick was on March 31st around $15, the stock immediately jumped to $21. Nice timing. Look at a chart, caught rewriting history again! As to "certainly spell disaster", my exact words were "looks like Bill is going to lose a few pesos on this one too!" Seems you embellished that one a little, eh?
"Not only does the Yoestman think that my short call of KERA (at 16) is wrong. He boldly proclaims that he will day-trade it. Note that he just managed to buy in near the end of the day at 13 1/4, just before it closed near the low. Nice day trade Robbie!" Thank you, I made a few quick bucks, it all adds up. Other than the fact that I posted at the exact time and price as I placed the trades, and the time/sale record confirms my prices, I can include a letter from my mom attesting to my integrity if you require further proof.
"KERA is now at 9 and change" Who cares, I profitably day traded it 2 1/2 months ago.
"Mr. Yoest...posting under the Yahoo handle "mgv2000" predicts that my short call on CCSI won't pan out." Oh, now I'm also every internet id that heckles you on the sites you post? Funny, you sound just like Visnic accusing a variety of individuals on this site of being MGV2000.
"I've been shorting the Valence fraud at various prices above 7 1/2 and from where I'm sitting it looks like....yep, Robert is wrong AGAIN!" This statement really doesn't surprise me since it is a know medical fact that one's vision can be seriously impaired with one's head planted so far up one's ass.
Truth stretching tally
wexliar 4 Yoest 0



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1287)6/11/1999 3:17:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
The CCSI stock fraud collapses.

Gee...how did that happen?