Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/10/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Robert	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Doesn't bode well for the PPI tomorrow morning and the CPI next week. <ng> -- Robert

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/10/1999 8:24:00 PM
From: Bill F.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

mb -this has been going on for some time.if the actual data was reported most of the time it would have caused lots of grief.oth-if the market was ready to go down it would do it regardless of the funny business.what is also coincidence is that we never get 2 bad pieces of data in a row.always lots of time between bad data points.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/10/1999 8:58:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

NSM lost a lot of dough -- must be time to buy INTC -- since all their competitors are losers. <VBG> When will AMD admit de feet.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/10/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: Activatecard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

WSJ has a piece written by Michael Ledeen in the editorial section detailing how professional civil servants " have been silenced or coerced into lying about matters that directly affected national security." If this is true and the administration is willing to "substitute facts with politically expedient information" concerning national security matters, what would be the big deal with fudging a few economic numbers.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/11/1999 12:53:00 AM
From: shrinks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

The Clintonista's lying to the American people to keep there approval ratings high, naaaaa... They now better than anyone that the public will not react to the revised figures.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/11/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike, >>I am not a conspiracy theorist and I don't think our govt. is trying to mislead us.<< I didn't think it was just a theory <g>. Wayne

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62022)	6/11/1999 9:12:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Did I hear you right Mike? You suspect that Slick's administration is putting out phony numbers? Here is bumper-sticker slogan for you: #reply-9962965 No one will be stupid enough to vote for Clinton twice, don't you think? -g-