Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (25157)	6/10/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: Gary E	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 44573

Maybe I bit off more than I wanted, should make for an interesting read mcs.surrey.ac.uk Hal

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (25157)	6/11/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

You aren't boring me, I have two degrees in Engineering , worked on a Ph.D......held an Expert rating in Chess.... This stuff is normal-speak to me. To be quite honest, the entire Theorem was simplistic so if anything I'm not bored, I just looking beyond it. My problem, I believe, is that I am looking for the "perfect" theorem. In other words, Fibanuch was not close enuf. The Nautilus stuff that you refer to is, as I recall, the "Golden Rule". not Fibonacci. But whatever, I need to back off (I suppose) and take the easy Math. I believe that it works more because many traders follow it. It is very "neat" in it's application, but I think it gets that way because of it's following and less because of the work of a dead Mathematician. Either way, I look at it myself; so I have no complaints. EDIT My son sez the Golden Rule is "Love Thy Neighbor as....." He sez as least hat's what they told Donald Duck. He says the Nautilus stuff is "The Golden Rectangle", but agrees it has zip to do with Fib numbers. Easy to confuse though, the Nautilus definitely is a completely different formula in Math. Off hand, I think the number there is around 1.625 but I can double check with some Math types if you like.