Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Common Errors in (American)English -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (149)	6/10/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 228

I am very impressed! Yes, you are quite correct, that I am fighting a losing battle. Practicality must (should) always take precedence, but I can still write and speak in the style I believe is the more correct one. You are our grammar expert and, as such, might be bombarded with questions! Thank you, and good luck, Carolyn

To: The Philosopher who wrote (149)	6/11/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: Scott Wheeler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 228

<< but neither are they made to enslave >> I agree, because how else can a language be alive and evolve (or should we say devolve, in this case)? You (or your references) did not mention that "than" is usually reserved for matters of quantity (e.g., larger than, heavier than), whilst "different from" only connotes a qualitative distinction, without saying what that distinction might be. I think the point can be made by attempting the absurdity "greater from". Another similar gem is the ubiquitous "less" in place of "fewer" (or its absurd obverse: "There is fewer money in circulation". (I like this better than "less dollars in circulation")...;^)