SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (61354)6/11/1999 1:51:00 AM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 1571939
 
Elmer,

Re:"Very nice but how can I comment when there is no data? What was the system configuration, operating system etc? Furthermore what were the benchmark measurements? You guys have a right to be excited but nobody has presented any data yet. Let the dust clear."

You are right, AMD probably doesn't know how to these measurements - I am sure they have never done them before.

And remember the K7 is just a "foil".

And remember AMD's 0.25 micron process is so slow they can yield anything faster than 300Mhz.

Oh and AMD has a special process so as the gates get smaller the K7 is bound to get slower!

Oh and they probably cheated with 10x the memory and the 100,000 RPM memories.

With the Intel faithfull spewing so much "dust" I doubt very much if your "vision" will ever clear.

Regards,

Kash




To: Elmer who wrote (61354)6/11/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1571939
 
Elmer, re:<how can I comment when there is no data> Nice try.
What was the system configuration, operating system etc?

Hard disk and memory size is irrelevant on SpecInt and SpecFP. We know K7 will not support PC133, therefore memory must have been plain vanilla (CHEAP) PC100. OS is a good question, but K6-3 was one speed grade ahead of PIII in both NT and Win98, so I doubt that it matters.

Petz