SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian who wrote (9740)6/12/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: Brian  Respond to of 10479
 
Nice article on metro dwdm from
DATA COMMUNICATIONS June 1999 By Andrew Cray

DWDM: In for the Short Haul?

The promise of just-in-time provisioning makes now the time to assess metro DWDMs


data.com

<thank's to ULYSSES at raging bull for finding this article>
Some highlights:
Right now, there are five vendors poised to take advantage of that market: Ciena Corp. (Linthicum, Md.), Ericsson AB (Stockholm, Sweden), Northern Telecom Ltd. (Nortel, Mississauga, Ontario), Sycamore, and Osicom Technologies Inc. (Santa Monica, Calif.) (see Table 1 data.com ). Long-haul DWDM vendors Alcatel S.A. (Paris) and Lucent Technologies Inc. (Murray Hill, N.J.) plan to ship metro devices later this year. And startup Optical Networks Inc. (ONI, San Jose, Calif.) says it has a DWDM product set for beta shipment in August.

....

Plug and Pay Less

As for provisioning services, carriers can tackle the task two ways. They can bring circuits to customers either directly on top of wavelengths, or they can carry them using current Sonet gear.

In the first scenario, customers just plug their equipment into the DWDM, and each of the services they use travels natively over a 2.5-Gbit/s wavelength, with multiple wavelengths used to provision multiple services. In the second scenario, carriers connect a DWDM to a
Sonet ADM. Customers plug their equipment into the ADM instead, using its multiplexing capabilities to break down the 2.5-Gbit/s wavelength into several lower-speed services, like T3s (45 Mbit/s) and OC3s.

Whether one approach is better depends on the service being sold. Splitting wavelengths means "you don't have to waste a whole wavelength for a relatively low-speed signal," explains Ron Mackey, Osicom's executive vice president of technology. But big-bandwidth apps work at such high speeds there's no need to multiplex them down, so they're better handled without additional Sonet equipment, says Steve Chaddick, Ciena's senior vice president of strategy and corporate development. He thinks any service above OC12 is delivered more efficiently on top of wavelengths. Then again, carriers might want to keep their Sonet add-drop multiplexers and use them in conjunction with a DWDM. "Sonet is something CLECs and RBOCs have lived and breathed for a long time, and they love it," Weingarten says. Most of today's DWDM products, he adds, don't offer nearly as much as Sonet in terms of configuration, restoration, or management.

Osicom, however, says its Gigamux may offer the best of both methods. It has so-called EPC (electrical photonic concentration) cards that split each wavelength into 16 lower-speed pipes supporting such services as DS-3, OC3, fast Ethernet, and FDDI. Baksheesh Ghuman, senior product manager at Electric Lightwave Inc. (Vancouver, Wash.), a CLEC that has been testing the product, says that's made for a 20 percent savings over a Sonet ADM. What's more, the Gigamux bundles everything in a single device, making it easier to manage. "Service providers like solutions," says Deb Mielke, an independent consultant at Treillage Network Strategies Inc. (McKinney, Texas). "They don't like to have to put everything together all the time." But Osicom's multiplexing scheme is different from Sonet's, so carriers may need to retrain their engineers in order to do that management.



To: Brian who wrote (9740)6/12/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: Brian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
Another inveresting post from Raging Bull

ragingbull.com

David Pawlak talking about Ciena deal

While this announcement by Ciena is a disappointment to us in that another company has won business in a market where our GigaMux could have been used, it is also a validation of what we have been saying (the short haul DWDM market is here now!). At no time have we ever publicly stated that we were in discussions or evaluations with C&W. Ciena has been supplying C&W with long haul DWDM equipment for several months now and therefore had an existing relationship with them. This is unfortunately one of the issues we will be faced with (competing against total solution providers). Ciena has been saying for over a year that they will be coming out with a metro solution and continually delaying its launch. Now it appears it is finally ready.

The market for short haul DWDM is very large and characterized by thousands of small - medium sized opportunities, versus the long haul market which is characterized by perhaps hundreds or so large opportunities. We knew this going into this market. Our size prohibits us from being a one-stop shop for service providers (long and short-haul solution) and this is the reason why Par's goal is to obtain 10% of this market. We are clearly excited about this large market opportunity and aggressively working to lock in as many orders as possible.

David Pawlak

ps. I have been re-posting a few pertinent posts from Raging bull as that message board is often very slow and we don't all have the time to read the hundreds of posts listed that board.

Brian