To: richard surckla who wrote (2247 ) 6/11/1999 1:00:00 PM From: The Philosopher Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2733
At the prodding of the prosecution Thursday, a witness let loose a stream of obscenities during the trial of a Michigan man who is accused of violating a century-old law against cussing in front of women and children. "I want out of this (obscenity) river, get that (obscenity) canoe back here -- (obscenities and obscenities)," witness Michael Smith hollered from the witness stand. Smith was describing what he said he, his children, aged two and five, and his wife heard from Timothy Boomer after Boomer fell out of his canoe last August. "I was afraid for my family. My adrenaline was rushing, my hands were tingling, my wife was covering my daughter's ears and I was trying to get through there as fast as I could," Smith testified. The cussing under oath took place in front of four women on the jury and several in the courtroom gallery. "The language (Boomer used) was indecent language. It was insulting. Some might consider it to be immoral," said prosecutor Rich Vollbach of Arenac County, Michigan. Defendent tight-lipped Boomer's attorney, supplied by the American Civil Liberties Union, maintained the case is outrageous. "A man is being prosecuted at the end of the 20th century for a speech crime under a law that was written back when the sensitivities of women were equated with the sensitivities of children," said defense attorney William Street. "It's an old, arcane law. No one should be prosecuted under that law," argued Street. Several potential jurors were excused Thursday after saying they did not think they could set aside their opinions and be fair, according to Street. Boomer, the man whose mouth got him arrested, did not talk Thursday. The 25-year-old factory worker has said previously he won't repeat the string of obscenities shouted last August when he fell out of his canoe after it hit a rock on the Rifle River. Boomer doesn't deny that he used some foul language, but says he didn't know children were nearby in the recreation area about 120 miles north of Detroit. Boomer was charged by a passing sheriff's deputy under a 101-year-old Michigan law that prohibits using any indecent, immoral, vulgar or insulting language in the presence of women and children. Boomer has said previously that he can't believe he could face a $100 fine and 90 days in jail just for swearing. "I thought it was a lie," Boomer said. "I (thought) the officers were out to patrol underage drinking, and I got accused of a 101-year-old law." 'Law is asinine' "He was mad, he was wet, it was an emotional reaction," said Kary Moss of the ACLU. "Can you imagine if we have police starting to go out and arrest people because they swear on the street?" "(Author Charles) Dickens said 'the law is an ass,' and in this case the law is asinine in attempting to criminally prosecute a man who wanted to apologize for uttering some cuss words after falling in a river," said Larry Dubin, a professor at the University of Detroit-Mercy Law School. But Vollbach said he had no choice but to take the case to court. "Mr. Boomer wasn't expressing any thoughts or ideas at the time. Certainly this couldn't be considered artistic, so I don't think there was First Amendment coverage for what he did that day," Vollbach said. To swear, or not to swear Many residents in rural Arenac County hope the case will help make common courtesy fashionable once more. "With women and children around, he should have held it down," said one man. "I just hope the message gets out that we should respect each other," said Ladd White, who runs a canoe livery along the Rifle River. "Men are going to be men and swear anyway, and so are women," countered another resident. No 'fighting words' in front of children Judge Allen Yenior, who is presiding over the trial, ruled in February that the prohibition on cussing in front of women is unconstitutional. But Yenior upheld the law as it pertains to children, saying Boomer's alleged expletives could be considered "fighting words," which the court has ruled lack constitutional protection. Win or lose, this trial is turning cussing into a dirty word in the town of Standish.