SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Zahran who wrote (31326)6/11/1999 12:50:00 PM
From: Karl Drobnic  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 31646
 
Fairness opinion: My take is that the "Fairness Opinion" will postulate that further dilutive capital raises will be necessary for TAVA to make the transition to a "post-Y2K Company". By making that argument, Prudential can say that the future growth we see for TAVA will be swallowed by debt financings or more issuance of shares. There are many protests that could be raised to this assumption (TAVA's balance sheet makes share buybacks possible; internal growth possibilites, etc.), but it will all end up a matter of conjecture, with Prudential being in the position of the "expert". And the larger the future capital raise is that Prudential postulates, the lower they make the current "fair value". If Prudential makes the "future capital raises" argument, I don't see much chance of challenging the buyout since Prudential could say, "We interviewed management, and management said that the future goals are ...etc." It will all turn into a closed loop of conjecture.



To: Jack Zahran who wrote (31326)6/11/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: JDN  Respond to of 31646
 
Dear Jack: If you really want to be puzzled take the CASH FLOW (a number that is more difficult to fudge than income) for the latest qtr, annualize it and calculate the PE on THAT. I believe that $8 represents less than a 7 PE on CASH FLOW. Personally, I think the qtrs will only get better. I have to wonder why management would be willing to sell out so cheaply??? JDN