Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1304)	6/11/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

In fact, last year, roughly the same time, and CCSI at $7-$8, I found it that expensive, that I shorted it with "impunity" ... now the share count has risen by far, and the outlook bleakened even more. And this dog is indeed at 8. But, at least this one falls, look at SRCM, which is up 7/8 near 21, on such a dog day, brrr.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1304)	6/11/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: lindend	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Don't forget the part about "playing with free shares". Why do the sheep always say its no big deal that the stock cratered since the shares are free???

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1304)	6/11/1999 5:21:00 PM
From: surelock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Thanks for CCSI. Was fortunate to add to my short near the close Thursday, and i did because of your analysis here. I consider this one of the best threads on SI.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1304)	6/11/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: Peter V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Looking for something else, I came across this post in the CCSI archives. I guess this should have been Bill's first clue about CK Houston: #reply-1901890