SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (61513)6/11/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1575602
 
Tenchusatsu, it may be that AMD added registers to 3DNow, since I've heard that there is no overhead switching between FP and 3DNow anymore. Of course, that moves the overhead to OS context switches, just like Intel's SSE.

We'll find out by 6/30.

Petz



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (61513)6/11/1999 6:04:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575602
 
Ten - Re: "But does the K7 add more architected registers? Pentium III's SSE adds eight new 128-bit registers to the x86 architecture, a move that was described as "about time" by Microprocessor Report."

I don't know.

What Dirk is saying is that the original 3DNOW implementation was poor and inferior to the Intel SSE implementation.

Thus, that 9 month "lead" in which nothing but a few games supported 3DNOW has evaporated and Intel is winning !

AMD developers will now have to choose to develop 3DNOW or "new & improved 3DNOW" software - or BOTH - which will really dissipate their efforts.

Paul



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (61513)6/11/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575602
 
Tench,

Yes.. 3dnow doesn't need mroe registers, because it has enough, with teh physical registers being remapped seemlessly between the FPU and the 3d-now/mmx units..

regards,

Steve