Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joey Smith who wrote (83292)	6/12/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: grok	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: <Looks like .18m 600Mhz Coppermine PIIIs could be ready by August if need be. As for the AMDotes, I'd love to see the Cost/Performance of these chips with the .25m K7 600 chips(if there are any around in August, that is <gg>)> This article either says or implies that Coppermine will work with the 440BX chip set with PC100 sdrams. If so, and it sounds likely, then this combination may be Intel's best weapon against K7. Coppermine+440BX+PC100 sounds better to me than Coppermine+Camino+600MHzRambus when you think of Cost/Performance. If box makers have this option they will take it and Intel will be looking for places to stick Camino. Of course, what the market should have is Coppermine+Camino'+PC133 where Camino' is Camino with optimized support for PC133.

To: Joey Smith who wrote (83292)	6/12/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: denni	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>>- Despite our view that the September launch of Rambus-based PCs remains on schedule, we believe that the recent collapse in synchronous DRAM prices will likely promote lower Rambus DRAM prices and potentially lead to a slower transition to the new memory architecture in the first half of next year. does this make any sense? no!. lower direct rdram prices will increase demand! except, i may wait for 733 piii/800 drdram.