Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kerry Sakolsky who wrote (5679)	6/13/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: JAMES F. CLASPILL III	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

She is one smart lady. I did notice in a very recent post by WM the he "PUT" EDIG back on his watch list after it fell below $2.00. Now, did not WM always state that he owned shares in EDIG!!!! Then how come its' back on his "watch list"??? The truth never changes, but lies have to be remembered!!!! Guess WM forgot that lie!!! You ever wonder if WM was a paid plant (mole) by who ever that knew EDIG's technoloy was going to be a big problem to them and wanted to "try" to discredit the technology and company. Seems he doesn't have a normal job as he is always on the BB with his slanted misinformation. I would guess the reason he is not here now is he and his BOSS are trying to come up with some damage control. Now one has to wonder how many other e-mails did WM receive that were favorable to EDIG and he selectively failed to post.

To: Kerry Sakolsky who wrote (5679)	6/13/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: chris431	Respond to of 18366

Hahahaha....that is rather funny since it appears the poster doesn't really understand the law. This is not really a comment about the poster rather about the use in general of references to the law in a manner that suggests a threatening use yet is completely a misconception or misunderstood portrayal of the law (yes, I'm guilty in the past and am not bashing anyone....just think it's somewhat funny). The most classic example is drug dealers, prostitutes, etc. ask a person if they are an undercover cop, believing that the person has to be truthful in their reply. Chris