Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Safeguard Scientifics SFE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: voop who wrote (3077)	6/13/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: robert miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4467

Voop, I believe that SFE fared pretty well last Thur. & Fri. when you look at the weakness in the internet sector. The pressure did not seem to be much more than that expected from going Ex. "DSSP". But, interest rates and the overall market present reason for concern. Relative strength may lead the majority of shorts to select internet stocks other than SFE. bob

To: voop who wrote (3077)	6/13/1999 9:05:00 PM
From: michael r potter	Respond to of 4467

-OT-Voop, Voop, I'm a techno-nincompoop. When I do paragraphs, [which is surprisingly often!], and hit send, somehow no paragraphs appear on the final result. [New Paragraph]. See? When I use tab, it doesn't work, I have to main bar click click click blanks, to get a paragraph structure. It comes out all run together. It hurt when his Royal Highness, the King of Prussia er a France said he beat me because he had more paragraphs. It was no contest. I felt real bad. [New paragraph], I just figured it was SIs way of saving virtual paper. Do you or any of your geek buddies have an answer? Another bit of weirdness is that if I if I hit submit, everything is lost, so I have to initiate, send a blank, hit edit, then compose, at least a message gets sent. If I forget to do a "false send" any composition is lost-very frustrating, especially for some that take over one to two hours to do. Don't know why my trusty Commodore 64 would let me down now after 16 good years [a falsehood, it is actually a Gateway P-5 166]. Mike