SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : SI Spammer Hall of Fame -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CatLady who wrote (532)6/13/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: Venditâ„¢  Respond to of 4105
 
I'm usually pretty vocal against spammers, but when they provide useful information (and stay on topic) along with the promotion, where does the line get drawn?

You may very well be correct and yes each was an on-topic post.

I normally think of spamming as a self-promoting person with an un-stated but very obvious agenda. The unstated agenda is then posted on multiple and random message boards in a short time frame in which the poster has no actual financial interest in the stock. He or she merely finds the message board a convenient place and way to advertise at no charge.

Again I may well be very off target here. I'll wait and see.

With deep respect,

Vendit



To: CatLady who wrote (532)6/13/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: Venditâ„¢  Respond to of 4105
 
So now the IntelligentSpeculator.com
is in a very defensive mode and personally attacking me for drawing attention to their spamming.

Message 10099611

The IntelligentSpeculator.com
is also helping others on other forums as well with the same stuff.

investorlinks.com

Where is that fine line?

<<<ggg>>>



To: CatLady who wrote (532)6/14/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: Venditâ„¢  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4105
 
Ok I have another one for you. Are these repetitive links this person kept shoving at me all day considered spam?

Message 10113017

<BG>