Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Tallant who wrote (21761)	6/13/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: Frank Ellis Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

TOM, I am not good at all trying to second guess the market or being a trader. I think if you believe that a company is a leader in its class and that it is making money which AOL is then in the long run it should do well by investors who put it away for the long term. Best Wishes Frank

To: Tom Tallant who wrote (21761)	6/13/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Respond to of 41369

By Aaron Pressman CHICAGO, June 13 (Reuters) - Convergence -- the much-hyped melding of entertainment, telecommunications and the Internet -- isn't coming to the cable television industry. It's already arrived. As the titans of cable gather here for their annual meeting, rapid consolidation is bringing greater resources to bolster the industry's infrastructure so companies can provide digital and more interactive television along with super-fast Internet access that an increasing number of consumers crave. By year end, more than one million customers will be logging onto the Internet over cable, still only a tiny portion of the online market, but many times the number getting high-speed access from telephone companies or other providers. The mergers, not all of which have been approved yet by regulators, have shaken up the corporate pecking order from last year's show. Long-distance giant AT&T Corp. T.N is poised to become the largest operator in the country after completing its $48 billion acquisition of Tele-Communications Inc. and announcing a $58 billion deal to purchase MediaOne Group UMG.N. Microsoft MSFT.O mogul Paul Allen has also been empire-building, announcing last month he would purchase Falcon Communications LP for $3.6 billion to jump to the No. 4 slot in the U.S. market. Allen, an early proponent of using cable wires to deliver high-speed Internet access, will sing the convergence hymn when he appears Tuesday along with the chief executives of two of the companies that are still bigger than his Charter Communications: Gerald Levin of Time Warner Inc. TWX.N and Brian Roberts of Comcast Corp. CMCSA.O And they will be preaching to an eager audience since, with stock prices and valuations up across the board in 1999, many in the industry are in a celebratory mood. In the regulatory arena, Federal Communications Commission authority over cable rates expired in March and the industry has so far prevailed in its two most critical Washington battles by preventing new regulation of cable Internet service and avoiding the forced carriage of broadcasters' new digital television transmissions. Decker Anstrom, president of the National Cable Television Association since 1994, said despite the recent success, the industry remains highly focused on lobbying efforts in Washington. After Congress passed laws regulating cable rates and cracking down on the industry in the 1980s, cable executives "see Washington is as important as their banker -- the impact of regulation hits on the bottom line," Anstrom said. Efforts to avoid regulation of cable Internet services received a setback June 4 when a federal judge in Portland, Oregon ruled that the local government there had the authority to force a cable operator to share its Internet pipes with competitors. Unlike heavily-regulated telephone companies providing Internet access, cable companies have chosen to require consumers linking to the Net over cable wires to buy that access along with Internet services like e-mail and Web page hosting for a single price. Internet service providers (ISPs) led by America Online AOL.N complain they are shut out by the practice, since few consumers will pay twice for Internet service. The companies want a ban on exclusive deals, especially when the Internet service is provided by a cable-owned company like AtHome Corp. ATHM.O or RoadRunner. "Open access is necessary because people want the right to choose their ISP," said Greg Simon, a former White House aide who is lobbying on behalf of the Internet companies. "There's no technological reason not to and there's no economic reason. It's just the cable companies wanting to get one more monopoly." Anstrom concedes that the recent court decision was "unsettling," but says there are few signs of support either among localities or in Congress and the FCC to regulate cable Internet service. "We're confident the decision will be overturned," he said. Washington analyst Scott Cleland says the battle over cable Internet will be "by far the biggest challenge" facing the industry on the regulatory front. Cleland, who predicts cable Internet will ultimately be opened to competition in a few years, argues that the Portland decision shifts the political dynamic by breaking through the logjam in Washington. "Now cable has a grass-roots and consumer problem whereas before this it was pretty much stalemated at the FCC and in Congress," Cleland said. REUTERS Rtr 14:54 06-13-99