SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (4162)6/13/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Ry, Mike... there was a catch to this, now that I now recall it more vividly. If you search under "three years," you obtain the results that you apparently did. You must instead specify "36 months" or simply 36 in order to find this unusually represented time frame. Usually they will spell it out, and then insert the numeral representation (36) in parens. Not here.

In doing a search on "36", here's what I caught applying to local and long distance guidelines in Part 151 or the Act.

Under Part 151, halfway down, a clause reads:

'(1) Joint marketing of local and long distance services: Until a Bell operating company is authorized pursuant to subsection (d) to provide interLATA services in an in-region State, or until 36 months have passed since the date of enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, whichever is earlier, a telecommunications carrier that serves greater than 5 percent of the Nation's presubscribed access lines may not jointly market in such State telephone exchange service obtained from such company pursuant to section 251(c)(4) with interLATA services offered by that telecommunications carrier.

A couple of paragraphs below this, you find:

'(B) Limitation: Except for single-LATA States and States that have issued an order by December 19, 1995, requiring a Bell operating company to implement intraLATA toll dialing parity, a State may not require a Bell operating company to implement intraLATA toll dialing parity in that State before a Bell operating company has been granted authority under this section to provide interLATA services originating in that State or before 3 years after the date of enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, whichever is earlier. Nothing in this subparagraph precludes a State from issuing an order requiring intraLATA toll dialing parity in that State prior to either such date so long as such order does not take effect until after the earlier of either such dates.

The second part does not relate to the issue that Mike brought up, except that there are
provisos in there for 3 years, as well. I'll leave the interpretations to you folks, which requires searching out all of the dependent clauses referenced in the first part above. Me? I'm going to have myself a cup of coffee right now, and listen to some 1963 Dave Brubeck, Joe Morello, Eugene Wright and Paul Desmond, "Live at Carnegie Hall," music, and Take Five.

Regards, Frank Coluccio